Statistical Properties of Social Choice Mechanisms
نویسنده
چکیده
Most previous research on statistical approaches to social choice focused on the computation and characterization of maximum likelihood estimators (MLE) of various parametric ranking models. In this paper, we take a traditional statistical approach by evaluating social choice mechanisms w.r.t. two important statistical criteria: (1) consistency, a minimum requirement for reasonable estimators, and (2) minimaxity, a well-accepted optimality criterion. For consistency, we propose a new and general class of social choice mechanisms called generalized outcome scoring rules (GOSR) that include many commonly studied social choice mechanisms. Given any ranking model, we fully characterize all GOSRs that are consistent estimators of it, and derive an upper bound on the convergence rate. We also showed that the bound is asymptotically tight for some GOSR and ranking model. This allows us to fully characterize all GOSRs that are consistent w.r.t. some model. For minimaxity, we characterize a class of minimax estimators for neutral ranking models. As a corollary, the uniformly randomized MLE has the highest probability to correctly reveal the ground truth among all estimators for a number of natural ranking models.
منابع مشابه
A Statistical Decision-Theoretic Framework for Social Choice
In this paper, we take a statistical decision-theoretic viewpoint on social choice, putting a focus on the decision to be made on behalf of a system of agents. In our framework, we are given a statistical ranking model, a decision space, and a loss function defined on (parameter, decision) pairs, and formulate social choice mechanisms as decision rules that minimize expected loss. This suggests...
متن کاملStatistical comparison of aggregation rules for votes
If individual voters observe the true ranking on a set of alternatives with error, then the social choice problem, that is, the problem of aggregating their observations, is one of statistical inference. This study develops a statistical methodology that can be used to evaluate the properties of a given voting or aggregation rule. These techniques are then applied to some well-know rules.
متن کاملA New Approach to Social Mobility
The traditional approach to statistical modelling is to begin with data on the properties of individuals, find associations between these properties and then attribute these associations to underlying behavioural mechanisms. This process is exemplified by the traditional study of social mobility patterns based on class, gender and ethnicity. [xx Some very typical examples?] This paper presents ...
متن کاملEvaluating Binary Alignment Methods in Microsimulation Models
Alignment is a widely adopted technique in the field of microsimulation for social and economic policy research. However, limited research has been devoted to understanding the statistical properties of the various alignment algorithms currently in use. This paper discusses and evaluates six common alignment algorithms used in the dynamic microsimulation through a set of theoretical and statist...
متن کاملComparison of the Effectiveness of matrix therapy and modern group reality therapy based on choice theory on resilience and social adjustment in methamphetamine-dependent men who are treated with buprenorphine
Purpose:The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of matrix treatment and modern group reality therapy based on choice theory on resilience and social adjustment in methamphetamine-dependent men who are treated with buprenorphine. Methods: The research was a experimental study with a pretest-posttest with control group. The statistical population of the study consisted of All m...
متن کامل